So these are my comments: Content: The creativity is great; the ideas are very clearly presented. The use of vocabulary is average, but easy to understand. Effects enhance the quality of the podcast correctly; however the music was distracting the listener’s focus on the actual conversation. Also, the starting part of the podcast was confusing, it sounded like it was kind of off track, I thought someone was hurt and it was advertisement for some health-medic-kit. After that it did get clearer, you could improve on that though. Delivery: It was great idea, but the conversation wasn’t very smooth. There were some parts that the talking was just cut up suddenly, giving it an unnatural feeling to the listener, that’s something you could improve on. Technical Production: Some transitions were a bit rough, but overall it was good. The volume of voice is definitely even throughout the whole advertisement. There were some extra parts that were just unnecessary, so it makes the advertisement a bit long. It was kind of interesting so that’s good. Improvements: As I said, you could lower the background music volume so the audiences can clearly understand, somehow make the introduction of the advertisement simpler, the talking shouldn’t be cut off so suddenly, the last thing is probably to edit and delete the parts that were unnecessary to the advertisement, for example, the ending was 5 seconds extra. I guess that's all!
Content: I think this adverts’ creativity is very good; their message is clearly presented in the advertisement about their product, Sweet Juicy. The vocabulary they used is appropriate but they could have used more strong words that can state the topic more clear. However, their grammar is very good it deserves a 10/10 and it is very smooth. They could have put more effects to enhance the quality of the advertisement. Their conclusion is also very clear and state what they want to sell. Delivery: the advertisement was very well rehearsed, they was delivered smoothly. This advertisement is also very enunciated. Music: the music works really good and it fits really well in the advertisement as a background. Technical Production: There are a lot of spaces in the end, they could have cut it out to make it better. The podcast length really keeps the audience listening.
I think that this advertisement is not so good. The overall content was good, since they focused on the topic and used good vocabulary words, although some pronunciation wasn’t so clearly. The enunciation is not so good sometimes, because it feels like they paused and created dead spaces in between. The correct grammar was used, and it seemed like it was well rehearsed because it was smooth delivered. The transitions are not so smooth because sometimes they had dead spaces. The volume of the voices is not so equal so it was not good too. The length of the advert is long, and they could have cut some unnecessary parts. I don’t think the audiences would understand this advertisement at first because the sounds made it confusing. Overall, I think this advertisement is average, so I have a lot of comments for it. The sound effects and the volumes can be change.
I think that the content is OK. The advertisement was creative and purpose was stated clearly. They used appropriate vocabulary that made the advertisement attractive to people. The effects are good and it improve the quality of this advertisement. Even though at first I don't quiet understand what this advertisement is about, but after that they focused on the topic. It was a good conclusion because they convinced people to buy their product and where to buy it, how to contact them. When I listened to their advertisement, I knew that they have rehearsed again and again. They have highly expressed voices that caught people's attention. They have correct grammar throughout the advertisement. The transitions are not so smooth and not spaced correctly. It also distract people because of dead spaces. The volume is great because it is the same throughout. The background music is not good because it doesn't match to their advertisement. I think the advertisement is a little bit long; they could throw away parts that are not important for the advertisement, example could be the breathing part. Overall I think this advertisement is good. If they could improve on their technical skills, I think this advertisement will be great.
Content: The creativity is great; the ideas are very clearly presented. The use of vocabulary is average but easy to understand. Effects enhance the quality of the podcast correctly; the music was great and not distract the audience from the conversation. There is one more thing that make me really confuse is the starting part of the podcast, it sounded like it was kind of off track and i thought someone was in jail because the door open sound sound like jail door. After that it did get clearer, you could improve on the first part again. Delivery: It was great idea, but the conversation wasn’t very smooth. The part when the girl said "Sweet Juicy can help you get rid of thirstiness and give you extra energy," it was to fast that i need to listen to it many times There were some parts that the talking was just cut up suddenly, so it will confuse the audience Technical Production: Some transitions were bad, but overall it was good. The volume of voice is very good. There were some extra parts that were just unnecessary, so it makes the advertisement a bit long. It was kind of interesting so that’s good. Improvements: Like I said, you could speak slower and fix the first part. Also, fix the conclusion. Delete the parts that were unnecessary to the advertisement, for example, the ending was 5 seconds extra.
I think this advertisement quite good. I think the content is good. Truthful information and clear ideas are presented. They have good grammar and good vocabulary.Their advertisement show clear purpose and it was creative. The Sound effects are good and it help the advertisement more interesting. The first time when I listen to this advertisement, i thought it was about the medicine that help people when they meet accident, but after it, i know what it is about because it focus on the topic and the purposed. Their technical Production is good because their translation are smooth and clearly, but sometimes they have dead space between each person's speech and made the sound hear unnecessary. Volume of voice, music and effect enhances the presentation that they advert. I think their podcast is medium, not too long and not too short and that made the audience have interest when they listened to it. Their Music Enhancements quite good because they made the music back ground smaller than the people's speech. But the music back ground doesn't quite matches with the purposed that they are advertise. Sometimes, their pronunciation not clearly and good.
I think they need improvement the next time is that they need to make their pronunciation better, they have to choose the correct music background that matches with the purpose.
The creativity is okay. They used nice voice and the pronunciation was smooth. There were tiny problems: Some parts had cut off sundenly. Spaces in the end.( They should used sound effect and music to make it better.) they did focus on their topic anyway, it was very interseted and it's a good avatisement
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSo these are my comments:
ReplyDeleteContent: The creativity is great; the ideas are very clearly presented. The use of vocabulary is average, but easy to understand. Effects enhance the quality of the podcast correctly; however the music was distracting the listener’s focus on the actual conversation. Also, the starting part of the podcast was confusing, it sounded like it was kind of off track, I thought someone was hurt and it was advertisement for some health-medic-kit. After that it did get clearer, you could improve on that though.
Delivery: It was great idea, but the conversation wasn’t very smooth. There were some parts that the talking was just cut up suddenly, giving it an unnatural feeling to the listener, that’s something you could improve on.
Technical Production: Some transitions were a bit rough, but overall it was good. The volume of voice is definitely even throughout the whole advertisement. There were some extra parts that were just unnecessary, so it makes the advertisement a bit long. It was kind of interesting so that’s good.
Improvements: As I said, you could lower the background music volume so the audiences can clearly understand, somehow make the introduction of the advertisement simpler, the talking shouldn’t be cut off so suddenly, the last thing is probably to edit and delete the parts that were unnecessary to the advertisement, for example, the ending was 5 seconds extra.
I guess that's all!
Content: I think this adverts’ creativity is very good; their message is clearly presented in the advertisement about their product, Sweet Juicy. The vocabulary they used is appropriate but they could have used more strong words that can state the topic more clear. However, their grammar is very good it deserves a 10/10 and it is very smooth. They could have put more effects to enhance the quality of the advertisement. Their conclusion is also very clear and state what they want to sell.
ReplyDeleteDelivery: the advertisement was very well rehearsed, they was delivered smoothly. This advertisement is also very enunciated.
Music: the music works really good and it fits really well in the advertisement as a background.
Technical Production: There are a lot of spaces in the end, they could have cut it out to make it better. The podcast length really keeps the audience listening.
I think that this advertisement is not so good.
ReplyDeleteThe overall content was good, since they focused on the topic and used good vocabulary words, although some pronunciation wasn’t so clearly.
The enunciation is not so good sometimes, because it feels like they paused and created dead spaces in between. The correct grammar was used, and it seemed like it was well rehearsed because it was smooth delivered.
The transitions are not so smooth because sometimes they had dead spaces. The volume of the voices is not so equal so it was not good too. The length of the advert is long, and they could have cut some unnecessary parts. I don’t think the audiences would understand this advertisement at first because the sounds made it confusing.
Overall, I think this advertisement is average, so I have a lot of comments for it. The sound effects and the volumes can be change.
Continued...
ReplyDeleteImprovement: They could have cut off the last part and use more effect with better and stronger vocabulary.
Great advertisement, nice voice, but I don't understand what's the first part was
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think that the content is OK. The advertisement was creative and purpose was stated clearly. They used appropriate vocabulary that made the advertisement attractive to people. The effects are good and it improve the quality of this advertisement. Even though at first I don't quiet understand what this advertisement is about, but after that they focused on the topic. It was a good conclusion because they convinced people to buy their product and where to buy it, how to contact them.
ReplyDeleteWhen I listened to their advertisement, I knew that they have rehearsed again and again. They have highly expressed voices that caught people's attention. They have correct grammar throughout the advertisement.
The transitions are not so smooth and not spaced correctly. It also distract people because of dead spaces. The volume is great because it is the same throughout. The background music is not good because it doesn't match to their advertisement. I think the advertisement is a little bit long; they could throw away parts that are not important for the advertisement, example could be the breathing part.
Overall I think this advertisement is good. If they could improve on their technical skills, I think this advertisement will be great.
Content: The creativity is great; the ideas are very clearly presented. The use of vocabulary is average but easy to understand. Effects enhance the quality of the podcast correctly; the music was great and not distract the audience from the conversation. There is one more thing that make me really confuse is the starting part of the podcast, it sounded like it was kind of off track and i thought someone was in jail because the door open sound sound like jail door. After that it did get clearer, you could improve on the first part again.
ReplyDeleteDelivery: It was great idea, but the conversation wasn’t very smooth. The part when the girl said "Sweet Juicy can help you get rid of thirstiness and give you extra energy," it was to fast that i need to listen to it many times There were some parts that the talking was just cut up suddenly, so it will confuse the audience
Technical Production: Some transitions were bad, but overall it was good. The volume of voice is very good. There were some extra parts that were just unnecessary, so it makes the advertisement a bit long. It was kind of interesting so that’s good.
Improvements: Like I said, you could speak slower and fix the first part. Also, fix the conclusion. Delete the parts that were unnecessary to the advertisement, for example, the ending was 5 seconds extra.
I think this advertisement quite good.
ReplyDeleteI think the content is good. Truthful information and clear ideas are presented. They have good grammar and good vocabulary.Their advertisement show clear purpose and it was creative. The Sound effects are good and it help the advertisement more interesting. The first time when I listen to this advertisement, i thought it was about the medicine that help people when they meet accident, but after it, i know what it is about because it focus on the topic and the purposed.
Their technical Production is good because their translation are smooth and clearly, but sometimes they have dead space between each person's speech and made the sound hear unnecessary. Volume of voice, music and effect enhances the presentation that they advert. I think their podcast is medium, not too long and not too short and that made the audience have interest when they listened to it. Their Music Enhancements quite good because they made the music back ground smaller than the people's speech. But the music back ground doesn't quite matches with the purposed that they are advertise. Sometimes, their pronunciation not clearly and good.
I think they need improvement the next time is that they need to make their pronunciation better, they have to choose the correct music background that matches with the purpose.
ReplyDeleteThe creativity is okay. They used nice voice and the pronunciation was smooth.
ReplyDeleteThere were tiny problems:
Some parts had cut off sundenly. Spaces in the end.( They should used sound effect and music to make it better.) they did focus on their topic
anyway, it was very interseted and it's a good avatisement
December 14, 2010 5:47 PM